Certified Research Administrator Practice Exam

What constitutes prior approval by the government regarding the inclusion of a subrecipient in an approved budget?

1. The issuance of a subagreement regardless of the vendor chosen

2. The need to obtain the identified services from a third party

3. Use of the named recipient

4. None of the above

The correct answer is: The need to obtain the identified services from a third party

Prior approval by the government regarding the inclusion of a subrecipient in an approved budget is best understood as requiring a clear justification for the need to obtain services from a third party. This ensures that the government agency overseeing the funding has a comprehensive understanding of how the inclusion of a subrecipient aligns with the project goals and funding criteria. When a principal investigator or institution proposes to include a subrecipient, they must demonstrate that the services provided by the third party are essential to achieving the project's objectives. This aspect of prior approval is crucial, as it helps maintain accountability and transparency in the use of federal funds, ensuring they are spent efficiently and effectively. In contrast, merely issuing a subagreement, irrespective of vendor selection, does not encompass the necessary approval process. Using the named recipient does not guarantee that their inclusion meets the requirements for prior approval either, as the rationale for utilizing a subrecipient must always be substantiated. Thus, the emphasis lies on the need for justification regarding the need to obtain services, ensuring that all parties involved are aligned with the project’s objectives.